Pitchfork
- » Tweet This
- » Go back, continue browsing
- » Save to Delicious
- » Click to Stumbleupon
What do you think? 3 comments
I’m sorry, but I hate this design. The lack of contrast makes it hard to distinguish sections from one another, and there’s a terrifying lack of attention to detail. I love minimalism and clean design, but on such a content-heavy site there needs to be more contrast—I find scanning this site immensely more difficult than the last one. Oh, how I loved the previous design. It could use some improvements, but it was easily scannable, fairly easily navigated, and most of all, it had personality. To think that Pitchfork spent thousands of dollars on this design is FLABBERGASTING.
I feel that hiding content inside tabs, for example, in news, headlines and tours, is practically the same as not posting the content at all, do they expect the user to click on every rectangle that seems clickable to reveal more content? or roll over all the covers to view more info ?
I agree. I was a big Pitchfork fan as a punter before web designer - I was hitting it daily but since the re-design I only visit once a week if that. Feels a but like tabs for tab’s sake.
About siteInspire
siteInspire is showcase and CSS gallery featuring the best web design today, designed, developed and curated by kulör | Follow us on Twitter
—
© 2010 kulör Ltd. |








Let us know what you think of Pitchfork. Please only provide constructive feedback, and be nice! You can use Gravatar to upload an avatar that will appear next to your comment.